Yep, that's what 0.0005 horsepower looks like |
Thursday, 2 December 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 9 - Fuselage nearly finished
Now that I had got the engine in at last, I could add some final detail:
Wednesday, 1 December 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 7 - The Engine
The engine for a Dolphin I was a geared Hispano Suiza; which I'm hoping looked very much like this:
The original generated 200hp, apparently, and I remarked to someone, in a jocular manner, that my 1/72nd scale replica would therefore develop 2.8hp. But this can't be right, can it? A model 3 inches long having the power of almost 3 horses at its disposal? That would be simply crazy.
The original generated 200hp, apparently, and I remarked to someone, in a jocular manner, that my 1/72nd scale replica would therefore develop 2.8hp. But this can't be right, can it? A model 3 inches long having the power of almost 3 horses at its disposal? That would be simply crazy.
Sunday, 28 November 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 6 - More Fuselage Clutter
Next: the instrument panel and all the clutter behind it.
I spent a lot of time studying Windsock 54 and the Cosford pictures before doing this bit. It looks as though there was a bit of variation in the layout; it probably depended on the variant. But the Cosford version looks like the Dolphin I, with its geared Hispano engine, and that's the variant I'm making, so I'm probably not too far off.
I spent a lot of time studying Windsock 54 and the Cosford pictures before doing this bit. It looks as though there was a bit of variation in the layout; it probably depended on the variant. But the Cosford version looks like the Dolphin I, with its geared Hispano engine, and that's the variant I'm making, so I'm probably not too far off.
Saturday, 27 November 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 5 - Rear Decking
Here's how it looks with the rear decking:
The problem here was to represent the effect of canvas over longerons. I knew I could forget right away about trying to carve or mould my way to a decent result, but I thought that a sheet of plastic card, scored on the reverse, might do the trick. I think I've seen this technique mentioned somewhere before. So I tried it out with a bit of scrap and it works a charm. The scoring actually serves a structural purpose in addition to what you could call its mimetic purpose, though the two are closely related. At this scale, a piece of card just doesn't want to conform to a roughly conical surface; but after scoring it curls up like a little kitten.
The problem here was to represent the effect of canvas over longerons. I knew I could forget right away about trying to carve or mould my way to a decent result, but I thought that a sheet of plastic card, scored on the reverse, might do the trick. I think I've seen this technique mentioned somewhere before. So I tried it out with a bit of scrap and it works a charm. The scoring actually serves a structural purpose in addition to what you could call its mimetic purpose, though the two are closely related. At this scale, a piece of card just doesn't want to conform to a roughly conical surface; but after scoring it curls up like a little kitten.
Friday, 26 November 2010
Tuesday, 23 November 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 3 - Vac-Forming
Vac-forming is never going to give very precise results with the sort of home-made equipment I'm using, but the key is to be aware of its limitations.
For instance, an injection-moulded kit might represent the forward decking as a single piece, with the fairings for the cylinder heads moulded integrally, but that would never work with my simple techniques. So the fairings have to be moulded separately. And there's no point trying to mould surface detail. You can add that later.
For instance, an injection-moulded kit might represent the forward decking as a single piece, with the fairings for the cylinder heads moulded integrally, but that would never work with my simple techniques. So the fairings have to be moulded separately. And there's no point trying to mould surface detail. You can add that later.
Sunday, 21 November 2010
Vac-Forming
Stretched Sprue
Thursday, 18 November 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 2 - Fuselage Framework
Wednesday, 17 November 2010
Sopwith Dolphin Retrospective No. 1 - The Theory
In my initial posts, I promised more details about my overambitious project to build a Sopwith Dolphin in 1/72nd scale,and now at last here is a post that looks like bearing out that promise, by means of a superb video followed by some no-more-than-adequate explication.
If you're going to scratch-build a fighter plane at all, then a First World War fighter plane is your only man. I think Flann O'Brien once said something of the sort. But what Flann O'Brien didn't make clear is that this is because there are a lot of flat and simple curved surfaces on a typical First World War aircraft, which you can reproduce by the good old method of cutting up bits of plastic and gluing them together. However, it was obvious right from the start that some vac-forming was going to be necessary for the decking and cowling, and so I had to tackle the problem of making sure that the built-up bits matched up with the vac-form bits. Another problem I made up for myself was how to improve on the methods I had used in the past to represent the internal girder structure. What I had done before, and what a modern kit usually does at this scale, is to represent the longerons etc. on the inside of the fuselage. The disadvantage of this is that it's very difficult to paint neatly. Also, it's quite difficult to make all the bits line up properly.
The solution I came up with was as follows:
That's the theory. How did it work in practice? Pretty well I think, as you will see in subsequent posts.
21/11/10
Post retooled in order to increase fidelity, with recessed panel lines and addition of the word "fighter" before "plane" in Flann O'Brien quote. This makes it sound a bit more like the original, you see.
If you're going to scratch-build a fighter plane at all, then a First World War fighter plane is your only man. I think Flann O'Brien once said something of the sort. But what Flann O'Brien didn't make clear is that this is because there are a lot of flat and simple curved surfaces on a typical First World War aircraft, which you can reproduce by the good old method of cutting up bits of plastic and gluing them together. However, it was obvious right from the start that some vac-forming was going to be necessary for the decking and cowling, and so I had to tackle the problem of making sure that the built-up bits matched up with the vac-form bits. Another problem I made up for myself was how to improve on the methods I had used in the past to represent the internal girder structure. What I had done before, and what a modern kit usually does at this scale, is to represent the longerons etc. on the inside of the fuselage. The disadvantage of this is that it's very difficult to paint neatly. Also, it's quite difficult to make all the bits line up properly.
The solution I came up with was as follows:
- Build up the framework as a freestanding structure, using a lot of Evergreen strip.
- Build the lower fuselage separately from 0.4mm sheet, standing in for canvas, plywood and aluminium.
- Carve wooden moulds for the vac-formed bits, sanding them down until they just fit into the fuselage skin.
- Do the vac-forming
- Cut the vac-formed bits to size
- Put everything together
That's the theory. How did it work in practice? Pretty well I think, as you will see in subsequent posts.
21/11/10
Post retooled in order to increase fidelity, with recessed panel lines and addition of the word "fighter" before "plane" in Flann O'Brien quote. This makes it sound a bit more like the original, you see.
Tuesday, 9 November 2010
Current Project
Stall being set out
This blog is going to be about some scale modelling projects that I've been working on recently. The subjects will be aircraft that you would reasonably expect to see finished in PC10, and they are most likely to be in 1/72nd scale. Until now they've been Sopwiths, including a Camel and a Snipe. And it's quite possible that I will build a ship's Camel at some point; but this causes a problem right away because then I'm going to have to finish it in PC12, aren't I? So my title is already potentially wrong. But judging by my current rate of work, this might not happen for several years, so excessive concern at this stage would be misplaced .
Actually, I've only finished two projects, and that was 10 years ago: they were, well, yes, the old Revell Camel and the Toko Snipe. I might give a bit more information on those in another post. But the point to make at the moment is that I spent a lot of time super-detailing those particular subjects and achieved quite presentable results I think. So after a gap of 10 years caused by continually moving house, I decided that my next project would be a Dolphin. When I first started thinking about this project there was a resin kit available in 1/72nd scale (I forget the make). But when I had a close look at it, I decided I could do better, so decided to build one from scratch. And that is my current project.
I am approaching this project without any special skill or tools, except a fine pair of tweezers and a big magnifying glass. Looking closely at the results so far, you could say that they demonstrate the limitations of this way of doing things, and it might have been better to use some miniature bench tools to obtain nice square cuts etc. As it is, I've made it this far without getting any two items parallel or at right angles to each other. But on the whole it's looking OK I think, and I've used one or two slightly innovative techniques that might be of interest. The most important thing is to be prepared to redo things that have come out wrong. That said, I am planning to give more thought to tools and techniques before continuing.
The next post will have a couple of pictures
Actually, I've only finished two projects, and that was 10 years ago: they were, well, yes, the old Revell Camel and the Toko Snipe. I might give a bit more information on those in another post. But the point to make at the moment is that I spent a lot of time super-detailing those particular subjects and achieved quite presentable results I think. So after a gap of 10 years caused by continually moving house, I decided that my next project would be a Dolphin. When I first started thinking about this project there was a resin kit available in 1/72nd scale (I forget the make). But when I had a close look at it, I decided I could do better, so decided to build one from scratch. And that is my current project.
I am approaching this project without any special skill or tools, except a fine pair of tweezers and a big magnifying glass. Looking closely at the results so far, you could say that they demonstrate the limitations of this way of doing things, and it might have been better to use some miniature bench tools to obtain nice square cuts etc. As it is, I've made it this far without getting any two items parallel or at right angles to each other. But on the whole it's looking OK I think, and I've used one or two slightly innovative techniques that might be of interest. The most important thing is to be prepared to redo things that have come out wrong. That said, I am planning to give more thought to tools and techniques before continuing.
The next post will have a couple of pictures
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)